FLOC 2018: FEDERATED LOGIC CONFERENCE 2018
Type-two polynomial-time and restricted lookahead.

Authors: Bruce Kapron and Florian Steinberg

Paper Information

Title:Type-two polynomial-time and restricted lookahead.
Authors:Bruce Kapron and Florian Steinberg
Proceedings:LICS PDF files
Editors: Anuj Dawar and Erich Grädel
Keywords:higher-order computability, feasibility of functionals, oracle Turing machines, applied lambda-calculus
Abstract:

ABSTRACT. This paper provides an alternate characterization of type-two polynomial-time computability, with the goal of making second-order complexity theory more approachable. We rely on the usual oracle machines to model programs with subroutine calls. In contrast to previous results, the use of higher-order objects as running times is avoided, either explicitly or implicitly. Instead, regular polynomials are used. This is achieved by refining the notion of oracle-polynomial-time introduced by Cook. We impose a further restriction on the oracle interactions to force feasibility. Both the restriction as well as its purpose are very simple: it is well-known that Cook's model allows polynomial depth iteration of functional inputs with no restrictions on size, and thus does not guarantee that polynomial-time computability is preserved. To mend this we restrict the number of lookahead revisions, that is the number of times a query can be asked that is bigger than any of the previous queries. We prove that this leads to a class of feasible functionals and that all feasible problems can be solved within this class if one allows to separate a task into efficiently solvable subtasks. Formally put: the closure of our class under lambda-abstraction and application includes all feasible operations. We also revisit the very similar class of strongly poly-time computable operators previously introduced by Kawamura and Steinberg. We prove it to be strictly included in our class and, somewhat surprisingly, to have the same closure property. This can be attributed to properties of the limited recursion operator: It is not strongly poly-time computable but decomposes into two such operations and lies in our class.

Pages:10
Talk:Jul 10 15:00 (Session 55D)
Paper: